People Accused Of Violent Crimes Should Not Be Allowed To Post Bail :: essays research papers

People Accused of Violent Crimes Should non Be Allowed To Post BailPeople criminate of hostile crimes should not be allowed to post bail andremain out of jail dapple their trial is unfinished. There atomic number 18 many reasons to whyI powerfully agree with this statement. Many factors atomic number 18 unknown to the publicwithout conducting some manakin of extensive research. Whether it is simplyreading in the paper about pending trials, or as complicated as researchingprevious trials. Bail is pertinacious by a judge, and their lives argon devoted tohandling these types of decisions. There are three solid reasons to why I feelit is necessary to revoke bail to those accused of violent crimes. One is thatall conditions for release are decided by a judge who is fully aware of thecircumstances. other is that these defendants, since being arrested, shouldbe considered a threat to public safety. My last, and final, reason is that my principle strongly agrees with denial of ba il to the accused.In Nebraska, as written in the Statutes of Nebraska, bail is grantedafter a judge takes into account the character and circumstances of the offensecharged. This judge looks at the defendants family ties, employment, financialresources, character and mentality, having resided in the community, convictionrecords, and record of court appearances or of flight to avoid pursuit orfailure to appear. A judge, when deciding if bail is to be granted, does notjust flip a coin to decide. He or she looks at all aspects of the situation.It all rests in the judges hands. When a judge looks at a person accused of aviolent crime, such as murder, a few things are liable to pop into perspective.One would be to how violent and detrimental the accusations are. Any rationalthinking person would realize that if arrested, they are in suspicion.Therefore, a state appointed judge is also breathing out to realize that this personmust be a threat, especially if accused of a violent crime. I t does not violatethe accused rights, because once downstairs arrest, their rights are strictly defineas what the judges final decision is.This leads me to my adjoining point, that these accused people are a threat.The purpose of bail, as defined by the Nebraska Statute, is to ensure that thedefendant will show at the trial. I researched a case where this was stronglyconsidered. Brian Mase is accused of shooting and violent death John Boyer, afterBoyer refused to leave Mases home. They were in a fight everywhere a stolen watch.